Lois Gray
  • Melbourne Victoria
  • Australia
Share on Facebook Share
  • Blog Posts
  • Videos

Lois Gray's Friends

  • Sherry Audette Morrow
  • Betty Austin-Ware
  • Vincent Holiday

Gifts Received

Gift

Lois Gray has not received any gifts yet

Give a Gift

 

Lois Gray's Page

Profile Information

About Me (Biographical Stuff):
Executive Officer in the Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University where, apart from executive duties, I write promotional material like marketing brochures.
I enjoy a country lifestyle on the beautiful Mornington Peninsula, south east of the city of Melbourne. My interests, other than writing, include reading, gardening, metal detecting and good friends.
Writing Interests, Goals & Published Works:
Creative non-fiction writer of short stories. Published in magazines, but more within the theme of business writing. Presently seeking to publish some travel articles. Have written a great deal of family history and plan to publish this as a social history embracing the past 100 years.
Ways BAF Might Be Helpful To You:
I would love to widen my network of writing friends who enjoy similar genres to me and who may be willing to critique my work and suggest outlets for it.

Comment Wall (13 comments)

At 11:15am on September 10, 2008, John Leslie Butchart said…
Lois, I'm so glad you joined this website! Do you have some pictures you can upload?

Nice profile. Your life sounds beatific.
At 1:05am on September 12, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Hi Lois, I lived in Melbourne as a young child and now have a daughter who is talking about eventually moving to Australia. I agree with Les; life down your way sounds great.
At 10:58pm on September 12, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Hi Lois, I took a look at Google maps to see where you were. It looks like you had a lovely drive. I lived across the bay from there on Beach Road in Hampton. Those are some of my best childhood memories.
At 11:00pm on September 12, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Just another thought. You could write an article about your home area. People here in the States would love to read about it. It seems all things Australian are everywhere in our media these days.
At 12:23am on September 14, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Hi Lois, I haven't done any travel writing so am not as familiar with this field. Just off the top of my head, most of our newspapers have travel sections in the Sunday editions, plus the American Automobile Association publishes a travel magazine. Your article sounds interesting. I know I'd want to read it.

Another thought that just occurred to me is that you could also look into publications on metallurgy. A great book to look into is Writer's Market. It lists lots of U.S. publications, including specialty publications.

I have a friend who is getting into travel writing. I'll ask her what she would recommend and get back to you.
At 12:14pm on September 14, 2008, Gary Greer said…
Dear Lois, the Copy Cat,
I was delighted to see that you have hooked up with this site. Meeting you was a highlight of Wildacres. Of course, our performance was splendid.

Gary Greer
At 12:22pm on September 14, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Here's a link to an article I wrote with my friend Olga Dugan. It was included in Cheryl Dellasega's book "Mean Girls Grown Up: Adult Women Who Are Still Queen Bees, Middle Bees, and Afraid-To-Bees."

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Story?id=1195438&page=3

Our article,"The Art of Antagonism," is about halfway down the page and continues onto the next page.

I mostly write fiction and those pieces have been publish in print publications.
At 12:19pm on September 24, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Hi Lois, I'm glad you enjoyed the article. My friend and I saw the call for submissions and immediately thought of the painting class we'd taken together. We were struck by how the attitudes of these two women colored the atmosphere of the entire class with tension and bitterness.
At 11:05am on September 30, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Hi Lois, Sorry not to get back to you sooner. My husband and I took an impromptu vacation to the hills of Western Massachusetts where internet service is practically non-existent. We're having a lovely time alternating between working on our writing projects (he, a screenplay; I, my novel) and exploring an area that is becoming more and more beautiful as the leaves don their autumn colors. I hope you are getting some creative inspiration as you move into your springtime.
At 9:22pm on October 9, 2008, Sherry Audette Morrow said…
Hi Lois,

I just heard back from my friend, who has been busy getting married and moving to West Virginia. She wrote the following:

I have published with the National Geographic Traveler Magazine. You friend could try contacting the following editors:

National Geographic Traveler
1145 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036

Shelia Buckmaster
Long Weekend Editor
SBuckmas@ngs.org

Susan O'Keefe
Hotel Central Editor
sokeefe@ngs.orgry

I know that Susan looks for interesting hotels for under $150 a night for her "Under $150" department.

My friend also recommended I talk to another mutual friend who is also doing travel writing. I will send her an email and see what other information I can dig up for you. I hope this will get you started.

Sherry

You need to be a member of Books Among Friends to add comments!

Join Books Among Friends

 
 
 

AT RANDOM by Lee Zacharias

PopMatters Book Reviews

Artists Without the Art: 'The Story of Rainer Maria Rilke and Auguste Rodin'



Artist biographies written for a popular audience necessarily involve compromise. On the one hand, we are only interested in the lives of artists because we are intrigued, engaged, and moved by their work. The confrontation with a work of art is an uncanny experience. We are drawn to, enraptured and entranced by, absorbed in the contemplation of an object. Even the performative arts (music, theater, dance) have an objective quality to them. In watching a play, we are not simply watching people do things; we are attending to the play as a thing that is more than the collection of actions performed. The play seems to have an existence beyond the human endeavor that instantiates it. It is simultaneously more and less than human: more because it's superordinate to human action and less because it's a mere object, lacking the evident subjectivity we prize in the human being.


When we are struck by the power of a work of art, we are enveloped by the strange power that objects can hold over us—an emergent and seemingly impossible subjectivity arising from its objecthood. Often, we ignore objects and treat them as mere equipment, tools that we employ in the execution of our daily tasks. Heidegger points out that it is when these tools break down that they become objects (German: Gegenstand —literally, that which "stands against" one). Objects, in the strong sense, are obstacles; they oppose us, hinder our progress through the world. When the hammer (Heidegger's favorite example) breaks down, we fix it (thus returning it to the status of equipment) or we toss it away (thus removing it as an obstacle). For the most part, in this line of thinking, we don't deal with objects in the world but rather with equipment.

Artworks, however, are rather special entities. As Kant recognized in the Third Critique , we approach artworks with a particular kind of disinterest; that is, we don't expect anything practical from the artwork — we don't expect it to behave as though it were equipment. The artwork retains its objecthood and part of our engagement with the artwork involves our acknowledging the hidden reserve, the uncanny presence, the disturbing intrusion of objects. At its most intense, the experience of the object can be unsettling; often, we just find it somewhat puzzling. Why, we ask, does this poem move us to tears? It can't be just the subject matter insofar as that is generally familiar and treated in other situations that move us not at all. Why, we wonder, does this particular sculpture seem to make a claim upon us, seem to demand that we not only observe it but somehow accommodate ourselves to it?

One typical recourse for our concern here is to turn toward the artist herself. If the power of the object frightens us, or even if it merely confuses us in its ability to move our emotions and titillate our senses, then perhaps it is better to attribute that power not to the object as such but to the person ostensibly behind the object. Most of us realize this is something of a dodge and yet it remains an enticing temptation to explain (away) the power of the artwork by grappling with the artist, seeing her as a person—perhaps noble, perhaps debased, but a person all the same. This is often the source of the allure of the artist biography.

On the other hand, most readers are uninterested or unprepared for a technical discussion of the work. Besides, that often merely leads us back to the discomfiting intrusion of the object. Moreover, generally people have trouble resisting the prurient details of the lives of others. And artists tend to have more opportunities for compromising personal situations insofar as their bad behavior is dismissed as the price of genius. Hence, the compromise. We want to come to grips with the mysterious pull of the art but in doing so we turn to the person of the artist, which often leads us away from the art. Striking the right balance is difficult and sometimes impossible.

In her 2016 book, You Must Change Your Life: The Story of Rainer Maria Rilke and Auguste Rodin , Rachel Corbett compounds the difficulty by examining the intertwined lives of two artists of two different generations and nationalities who worked in two starkly different media. The book, now being released in paperback, has received glowing accolades from numerous sources and won the 2016 Marfield Prize. Obviously, there's a substantial audience for this kind of book and this kind of writing. One's opinion of it, however, hinges upon what one seeks in an artist biography. If you're looking for a narrative that outlines the various entwinements of two great artists, this should be an appealing read. If you're looking to explore the nature of the art they produced, to come to grips with the strange power it exerts, you would do best to look elsewhere.

Corbett divides the book into three parts. The first, "Poet and Sculptor", traces the development of both artists from childhood to maturity (or, for Rilke, early maturity) prior to their first encounter. Here we learn about Rodin's struggle for recognition, his alienation from the establishment, his artistic awakening conditioned by his work as a laborer, and his penchant for becoming romantically involved with his models and students. Meanwhile, we follow Rilke's transition out of an adolescence overshadowed by a controlling mother who longed to be considered a member of the social elite, his struggles with military school, his marriage, and the contract into which he entered to produce a monograph on Rodin.

Part Two, "Master and Disciple", comprising the bulk of the book's pages, gets to the central concern of the book: the relationship between these two artists of very differing temperaments that nonetheless for a time found an artistic kinship. There are several intriguing anecdotes in this section, including the first encounter between Rilke and the woman who took care of Rodin and had his child, Rose Beuret; she apparently didn't take kindly to Rodin's disinterest in her at dinner (he failed to even introduce her to his new acolyte). The lesson that Rilke seems to take most to heart from Rodin (both from his impromptu lectures and from the manner in which he lived his life) is the axiom that one's work must take precedence over one's very life: travailler, toujours travailler .

Corbett reveals how this mantra of Rodin's served both to invigorate Rilke's creative life and impede his personal relationships. Perhaps the most compelling aspect of Corbett's book is her refusal to allow either Rilke or Rodin off the hook. Neither figure comes across as particularly sympathetic; indeed, both seem rather boorish, self-involved, careless of the feelings and needs of others. Perhaps this is not surprising—most biographies of this sort seem to emphasize the trope of the difficult artist—but Corbett's reluctance to justify or condone their behavior and neglect forces the reader to consider the role of others in the lives of artists (the other as supporter, patron, lover, defender). Eventually, Rilke becomes Rodin's secretary but this leads to their falling out over a silly misunderstanding. Corbett suggests that this was a necessary separation—a Romantic glorification of the departure of the Prodigal Son—and integral to Rilke's artistic independence.

The third section, the brief "Art and Empathy", serves as a denouement, documenting Rodin's death and touches lightly upon Rilke's extended affair with the Polish painter Baladine Klossowska. Judging from the title, Corbett probably intended this section to round off the book through a final discussion of a thread that she attempted to weave throughout her narrative: the development of the concept of empathy and its relation to artistic reception and creation. This, however, is one of the starkest weaknesses of the book. Corbett provides only the scantiest space to a rather unilluminating discussion of empathy. As such, it serves as another in a string of attempts to provide a contextualizing "atmosphere" to her narrative by detailing the state of art in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This does surprisingly little to clarify the relationship between Rodin and Rilke or to provide any real insight into the creative works of either.

Thus, even as an exploration of the lives of Rilke and Rodin, the book has several flaws. The writing is uneven, shifting between an objective (and rather dry) accounting of the details of their relationship and a rather saccharine adulatory mode that shades into the realm of historical fiction writing at times in its attempts to create a kind of emotional intensity. These melodramatic moments often involve Paula Becker, a painter-friend of Rilke's wife, the sculptor Clara Westoff. She seems to be a fascinating figure in her own right but she has little to do with the relationship between Rilke and Rodin (they both knew her) and Corbett seems to reserve Becker for injections of pathos. It all feels a little exploitative. Westoff, certainly the more pertinent figure, provides a more interesting angle for consideration insofar as her artistic work was often sacrificed on the altar of Rilke's career.

I suppose what I found most disappointing about You Must Change Your Life is that it tries to do so many things at once and, in that endeavor, does rather little beyond presenting a not-altogether-compelling narrative of a series of encounters between two great artists. There are many enticing possibilities here: a cultural and philosophical consideration of empathy as a way of connecting with artworks as objects with an uncanny, emergent simulacrum of subjectivity (one that may preclude, at least for Rilke, actual human connection); an investigation into the costs (mostly to women) of the successful creative careers of established artists (mostly men); an exploration of the manner in which one art form inflects another. That last possibility is sorely missed in this book.

Rodin once claimed that Edward Steichen's photographs of the Balzac sculpture would make the world understand it. This is a stunning claim. A viable path to the comprehension of one artwork is through the contemplation of another. Certainly, Rilke's poetry, inflected as it was by Rodin's influence, exemplifies this kind of trans-medial essence but the reader will only get the merest hint of the consequences of this connection in Corbett's book and hardly any discussion of what that means for our understanding of Rilke or Rodin. And so the artwork as object, obdurate in its refusal to reveal the mystery of its intimations of an affective subjectivity, remains beyond our grasp; anecdote is forced to stand in for comprehension.

© 2017   Created by Vincent Holiday.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service